Category: atheist


So, I’ve been away for the past week or so.  Doing freelance video work for the Kansas State Fair.  It’s a busy week, but I get to work with some great guys, see some great (and some shitty) shows and make great money.  I don’t have anything prepared really – but I thought I’d get on here and post some random junk…

The Pope in England: I cannot believe people still care what this man has to say.  Now, he wants atheists to apologize for Hitler?  I won’t go to much into detail with Hitler, but I will say that his issues went far deeper than religion.

Hitler’s name and deeds have been thrown around so much that they’ve essentially lost all meaning.  How many times have you heard, “Man, our waiter is like the ketchup-nazi.”  “Oh, you mean that our waiter is going to order the slaughter of millions…over the ketchup?”

Not to defend Hitler, but at least his evil was out in the open. The Pope should pay closer attention to his own evils (and the evils of his own organization)…and quit blaming atheists for the world’s woes.

Hawking on Larry King Live: I finally got around to watching Stephen Hawking on Larry King Live…I thought he was brilliant and blunt (if you have not watched it yet, head over to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AdKEHzmqxA and check it out).  He’s usually brilliant, but not often blunt.  He didn’t go into great detail about what his new book was about, just that the scientific account is complete and that theology was unnecessary.  He was so blunt that at the end of the interview, I almost expected him to throw down the microphone and yell, “Hawking Out, Bitches!”

The panel after this interview left a little to be desired.  I felt Leonard Mlodinov did a good job of explaining how the universe may have come about…but I’m aggravated that he dodged the “Are you atheists?” question…  “Yeah, we’re saying that there’s no reason to believe there’s a Creator. But, we aren’t willing to attach the word ‘Atheist’ to that.”

Father Robert Spitzer talked a lot about why he felt there was a creator, but he mentioned nothing (nada, zilch) about the God of the bible. The one with the rules and the punishment and the Adam and Eve and the Jesus…just, “There’s probably a God.”  He did nothing to back up the bible…

Deepak Chopra…does anyone give a shit what this guy says?  Really…

Also, I listened to “The Grand Design” audiobook once…and am going to do it again.

My Dad: I am noticing more of my dad in my mannerisms as I get older.  This is a good thing.

Pray for Them: Lots of people say “Pray for our Troops fighting overseas” without the slightest inkling that that’s the whole reason they’re in that mess.  I Support our Troops even if I don’t always support their mission.

Theist Coworker: A coworker (who is Mormon) asked me what religion I am, I responded that I have no religion…and that she would be unlikely to meet anyone less religious than me.  She asked if I was against religion.  Unfortunately I didn’t have enough time to answer this properly, I simply said, “Yes and No…I’ve no problem with people using the concept of God to guide their own lives…I am against it when they use the concept of God to guide others’ lives.”

Country Music Idiot: While working at the fair this year, one of the country music performers (let’s call him “Blake S.”…no, that’s too easy…let’s go with “B. Shelton”) said to the crowd, “One of the things I love about Kansas is that everybody gets to be themselves…and you can be as redneck as you want…and no one will judge you” then continued (paraphrasing, but not exaggerating) “But not them people who wear their pants below their ass…man, why do they do that…it just looks STOO-PID!!!  Next time you see one of them, tell ’em to pull their pants up over their asses!”

Implied racism aside (I know, white guys do it, too…), how narrow-minded do you have to be to say that everyone gets to be themselves in one sentence…then dog on people for how they dress in the next?

Activia commercials: Erectile Dysfunction, hemorrhoids, laxatives, that “not-so-fresh-feeling”, and “clean your balls.”  Over the years, companies have bombarded us with TV commercials that deal with very private issues.  We see ads all the time for private products that people purchase for private use…and they’ve never bothered me.  But, I find Activia commercials hard to stomach.  Why? Activia’s sole purpose is to help women who have trouble shitting.  Sure, the ads tout variety and flavor…but the underlying message…eat Activia and you’ll be shitting better in two weeks.  Jamie Lee Curtis is shitting better thanks to Activia…and YOU can TOO!

The problem is that Activia really isn’t a “private” product.  It’s something you keep in your refrigerator.  Have any of you seen Activia in someone else’s fridge? I have…at my mother-in-law’s house.   All I could think of is, “My wife’s mother doesn’t shit right” (shudder).  Not only that…I want to ask her, “Sooooo, are you shitting better?”

Gross.

//jb//

Update: Oh, and then he decided not to do it. 🙂 God apparently changed his mind…

————

So, there’s this guy in Florida who’s organizing an “International Burn the Quran Day” on September 11th and all I can think about is…WHY?!  What purpose does burning this book serve?

CBS News: Burn the Quran Day

I feel like I’m in a glass house casting this stone…after all, I did proudly participate in “Draw Muhammad Day” – in fact, you’ll see my rather saccharine contribution here. It’s a simple pencil sketch on a Post-It note – took me all of 16 seconds.

Is burning the Quran worse than drawing Muhammad? I think so…and here’s why…

Draw Muhammad Day, at least for me, was about pointing out how silly some of the practices of the Muslim faith are.  It was a way of saying “Look, I drew Muhammad and I didn’t get struck by lightning.”  I admit, I am well aware that the simple act of putting pencil to paper with the intent of drawing Muhammad was offensive to Muslims.  I also eat pork products nearly every day which, according to the Quran, is also offensive.

Besides, I am not part of the Muslim faith.  As such, I am not bound by their rules.  Just like I am not obligated to wear a uniform or salute military officers because I am not a member of the military (I was, but not now).

Burning the Quran only serves to agitate people of the Muslim faith. Burning the Quran draws attention to hate for their faith and hate is never the right path toward peace.

Besides, why do this on September 11th? Okay, I know the answer to that one…but hasn’t this date been marred by enough hate?  It’s almost like the people who organized this monstrosity of an event want to dwell on the hate and contempt of the attacks. You win a battle by being the better person…and the better person is always the one with less hate towards others.

You probably noticed, I’m not referring to these Quran-burning goons as Christians.  I’ve read enough about this event to know that most sensible Christians (oxymoron?) do not support it. I also won’t refer to the organizer, or his church by name – I feel they have gotten enough attention.

“International Burn the Quran Day” is a publicity stunt for maniacs.  The sad thing is that it will serve that purpose well.  It’s certainly getting attention. I’m writing about it, you’re reading about it and when it happens, you can be certain that TV cameras rolling.  When those clips air in Muslim areas of the world – they will be representative of ALL OF US!  Just like the actions of the 9/11 terrorists were unfairly representative of all Muslims.

I feel the best way to commemorate those who died in the attacks is to do what they were doing when they died…just living their lives.  We aren’t going to forget what happened to them…but spreading hate toward an entire faith because of the actions of a few is at the apex of hypocrisy and the nadir of compassion and tolerance.

I think September 11th should just be “International Go About Your Business Day” – I know I’ll be participating.  How about you?

//jb//

When I started this blog, I decided that I wasn’t going to harp on the bible.  I realize that people hold this book very dear, and it is not my style to disparage something that people hold so dearly.  This post will be an exception to that…but there are things that just need to be said. 

I have to admit – I didn’t grow up reading the bible.  I knew many of the stories – Adam & Eve, Noah’s Ark, Jesus – you know, stuff like that.  However, I was well into my teens before I realized that grown-ups actually took it seriously.  I mean, sure, we celebrated Christmas and Easter – but never really as religious holidays.  They were times to get together as a family and enjoy ourselves. 

I read the bible as an adult – and I have to say that it baffles me just how much people take it seriously.  Not only to the stories defy logic, they’re an affront to human nature.  There is no progress in the bible…

Today, I’m going to spend some time writing about the many ways people try to explain the things in the bible…

Allegory:
Many try to say that what’s written in the bible is “allegory” and should not be taken literally – but there is nothing in the bible that would suggest that the contents within should be considered less than the literal word of god. God created the universe and everything in it, then gave a vague set of rules for its residents to abide – and horrible punishment for those who don’t.
 
The problem with the allegory argument is that it gives believers breathing room for their faith. They can use what’s in the bible to justify nearly any point of view. “The bible says that women who are disrespectful to their husbands should be stoned to death, but I see that more as god saying that people should be nice to each other.”  This clearly makes no sense. Of course, most Christians won’t bring this up because they don’t realize just how bluntly the bible says that women who disrespect their husbands should be stoned to death. Why don’t they realize this? Because they haven’t actually read it.
 
Some even use the allegory argument to support evolution as something that god had a hand in. “The bible says the world was created in six days, but we don’t know how long a day is to God…we can’t assume that a day for god is 24 hours like it is for us.”  A day is the time it takes for our earth to make one revolution…24 hours (give or take a fraction of a second here and there). There is no reason to believe that “built the universe in six days” means anything more than six 24-hour periods. Besides, according to the legend – while god created light and coined the terms day and night on the first day…the sun and the moon (the two great lights in the sky) were not created until the fourth day.  For all intents and purposes, the sun is the source of all natural light on earth. So, without the sun – there is no light. I think you see where I’m going with this, so I’ll leave the completion of this idea to you. From a practical and temporal point of view, Genesis makes no sense. Take that one step further, it would make no sense for god to have created days…then use a different, arbitrary time scale and call it a day.
 
Times Have Changed:
Another feeble argument is “times have changed”. I’ve heard from people who say that some of the more stringent portions of the bible no longer apply in the modern world. This implies that there was a time when stoning a woman to death for disobeying her husband was appropriate. Seriously?  Should this even be up for discussion. Trite sarcasm and “every 28 days” jokes aside – name one situation, or series of situations where stoning a woman to death because she disobeyed her husband (or any reason) would be appropriate?  “You shall not murder.”  (Exodus 20:13) – Murder is the taking of a human life by another human…if you stone a woman to death, you shall murder her.
 
Old Testament Argument:
This brings me to another argument, the “old testament” argument.  When I asked a recently divorced Christian friend of mine why his ex-wife (also a devout Christian) was not brought out into the street and stoned to death as commanded by god, his response was…that’s the Old Testament. I will go back to my previous argument of “What kind of world is better off abiding by rules that involve stoning non-subservient women to death!?”
 
Also, if you would read the New Testament, you will find many passages clearly stating that it does not cancel out nor does it replace the Old Testament. There are too many passages where even Jesus subscribes to the Old Testament teachings to mention here…so, I’ll just post one…
 
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets.  I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.  Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place.” ~ (Matthew 5:17 NAB)
 
The Old Testament is a disgusting piece of literature. It is filled with hate, greed, vengeance and death.  Jesus was all for it…and that’s all I have to say about that.
 
Mysterious Ways Argument: 
The last argument I want to touch on is one that is a little more difficult to dispute, not because it makes more sense…but because it needs no explanation at all. I call it the “Mysterious Ways” argument.
 
The basis of the argument is this: Because god is of unimaginable intelligence and complexity, it is futile for us to try to figure out exactly what his intentions and abilities are. God does things because it is part of a plan that we cannot even begin to comprehend. “Mysterious Ways” is the last Bastian of hope for the faithful to cling to. If someone defaults to the “Mysterious Ways” argument, it simply means the only reason a person believes in god is because they want to believe in god. Wanting to believe in god defeats the purpose of faith.
 
Atheists are not without faith…we just put our faith in things we can actually trust. Things like truth and logic.
 
If I am holding onto a ball, and I let go – I have faith that the ball will travel downward with the force of gravity until it reaches the next available solid surface (usually the ground, perhaps a table or my foot) where it will either land or bounce successively until it stops or something else introduces energy to it. This is not something I want to believe, but I do. More importantly, this scenario is not dependent on my faith. It will happen even if I believe the ball will fall halfway to the next surface and stay suspended in mid-air.  I could have total faith that the ball will go upwards against the pull of gravity when I let go of the ball, but it will still fall downward. I could gather my friends, family, co-workers…and every single person on the planet at the same time to have faith that the ball will fall upwards against the force of gravity and it will still fall downward.
 
Again, wanting to believe something defeats the purpose of faith. 
 
//jb//